Financial records
Audited or provisional statements, ledgers or trial balance, tax returns and current-year performance.
Quality of records affects model reliabilityA structured working set for lender discussions, working-capital assessment, term-loan proposals, expansion projects and internal feasibility decisions.
CMA data and project reporting are useful when a business needs to explain how past performance, operating assumptions, funding needs and repayment capacity connect. The required format and depth vary by lender, facility, sector and project stage.
The final list is agreed after reviewing the lender’s checklist or the internal decision requirement. It may include:
The exact request depends on whether the entity is new, operating, audited, seasonal, project-based or undergoing expansion.
Audited or provisional statements, ledgers or trial balance, tax returns and current-year performance.
Quality of records affects model reliabilityProducts or services, installed capacity, volumes, pricing, margins, customers, suppliers and operating cycle.
Management validates the assumptionsExisting sanctions, repayment schedules, security details, proposed facility and promoter contribution.
Lender format is requested where availableThe model is developed in an original sequence designed to make inputs, judgements and dependencies visible.
Confirm the facility, purpose, proposed amount, reporting period and lender-specific requirements.
Review historical statements, current-year records, existing debt and material inconsistencies.
Link revenue, capacity, costs, working capital, capital expenditure and funding assumptions.
Management validates assumptions; agreed schedules, notes and editable or final outputs are delivered.
Each package states the included work. We confirm applicability, records and timelines before engagement.
Prices were reviewed in August 2026. Government fees, statutory charges, stamp duty, GST, certificates, subscriptions and third-party costs are additional unless a package expressly includes them.
Fees are quoted after reviewing complexity, data condition, reporting horizon and the lender’s format.
Review an existing projection set for consistency, assumption gaps, formula issues and presentation risks.
Develop the agreed CMA schedules or project report from available records and management inputs.
Update assumptions or address a defined round of lender questions after the initial working set.
Add management scenarios, cash runway, break-even or project sensitivity views where needed.
A professionally prepared model helps present the business case consistently. It does not replace lender due diligence, valuation, technical appraisal, legal review, collateral evaluation or credit approval.
Yes, when the lender has supplied a format and its use is included in the agreed scope. Otherwise, we first confirm which schedules and presentation are appropriate.
Yes, but projections must be supported by management assumptions, project quotations, capacity, pricing, operating-cost and funding inputs. The lack of historical performance is stated as a limitation.
We can model justified scenarios, but assumptions must be reasonable, disclosed and approved by management. We do not manipulate figures solely to reach a target result.
Only if expressly included. The number and nature of query rounds are agreed because lender requests can vary substantially.
Third-party reports, certifications, valuations, technical studies, legal work, taxes and external charges are separate unless the written quotation says otherwise.
Provide an email address or mobile number. The detailed message is optional.